Development and Validation of Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Atenolol and Lercanidipine from Tablet Dosage Form by Second Order Derivative Spectroscopy

 

Neela M  Bhatia* and A Y Gavali

Bharati Vidyapeeth College of Pharmacy, Kolhapur-416013.

Author E-mail: ashutoshgavali@gmail.com

 

 

ABSTRACT

Atenolol and Lercanidipine are used in combination for treatment of hypertension. The present work deals with simple spectrophotometric method development for simultaneous estimation of Atenolol (ATN) and Lercanidipine (LER) in tablet formulation. The method employed second order derivative spectroscopy1. For determination of sampling wavelength 10 µg/ml of each of ATN and LER were scanned in 200-350 nm range and sampling. The values of 2D amplitudes were measured 275 nm (zero crossing of LER) and 322nm (zero crossing of ATN) for the determination of ATN and LER, respectively. For this method linearity was observed in 10-60 µg/ml for ATN and 10-60µg/ml for LER. The recovery studies confirmed accuracy of proposed method and low values of standard deviation confirmed precision of method. The method is validated as per ICH guidelines.

 

KEYWORDS: Atenalol, Lercanidipine, UV-Derivative spectroscopy, Validation

 


 

INTRODUCTION:

Atenolol (4-(2-hydroxy-3-isopropylaminopropoxy) phenylacetamide) (ATN), is one of the most used antihypertensive agent2-4. It showed longer half life and minor side effects than other drugs from β-blocker class. A literature survey revealed different analytical methods for estimation from pharmaceutical dosage forms5-7. Some bioanalytical methods are also reported for its estimation from biological fluids as well as bio-equivalence studies were performed8-12.

 

Lercanidipine(2-[(3,3-diphenylpropyl)methylamine]-1,1-dimethylethylmethyl1,4-dihydro-2,6-dimethyl-4-(3-nitrophenyl)-3,5 pyridinedicarboxylic ester (LER), is a calcium channel blocker. A literature survey revealed different analytical methods for estimation from its pharmaceutical dosage forms including pharmacokinetic studies and stability studies13-16. The combination therapy of β-blocker and calcium channel blocker becomes often necessary and such dosage forms have been formulated. The present research article reports simultaneous estimation of ATN and LER from its combined tablet formulation. The assay was developed by using isocratic RP-HPLC method

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Instrument:

Spectrophotometric analysis was carried out on a JASCO UV-spectrophotometer 530 using a 1 cm quartz cell. The instrument settings were zero order and second order derivative mode and band width of 2.0 nm in the range of 200–350 nm.

 

Reagents and chemicals:

Atenolol and Lercanidipine supplied by Cipla Ltd. India. All solvents were spectrophotometric grade obtained from SD fine chemicals. Water purified by glass distillation apparatus.

 

Method:

Stock solutions were prepared separately in water: methanol (70:30) to obtain 100 µg/ml of all drug. The nine working mixed standard were prepared by dilution of stock solution in same solvent system in concentration range 5-30 µg/ml of ATN and 5-40 µg/ml for LER. Atenolol and Lercanidipine initially scanned for determining sampling wavelength in range 200-300 nm. Sampling wavelengths 275 nm for ATN where LER showed zero crossing point 322 nm for LER where ATN showed zero crossing point. Calibration graphs were constructed from the absorbances at respective wavelength.

 

Analysis of commercial formulation:

Content of twenty tablets were taken and powder equivalent to 10 mg of ATN taken and added in 60 ml of solvent system sonicated for 10 min after sonication volume was made up to 100 ml. 1ml of this stock solution was diluted to 10 ml to get concentration equal to 25 µg/ml of ATN and 5 µg/ml of LER. This solution is scanned in range 200-350 nm taking solvent system as blank. The spectra obtained was converted second order derivative spectra absorbances were noted and concentrations were determined from regression equations generated from calibration graph.

 

 

TABLE 1: RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF COMMERCIAL FORMULATION

Analyte

Label claim (mg/tab)

% Label claim estimated (Mean ± SD*)

RSD*

ATN

50

100.22±0.8722

0.8702

LER

10

100.10±0.8064

0.8055

 

 

 

 

 

 

SD: Standard Deviation, RSD: Relative Standard Deviation.

*Denotes average of six determinations.

 

TABLE 2: RESULTS OF PRECISION STUDIES

Analyte

Label claim (mg/tab.)

Amount estimated

% label claim ±SD*

ATN

50

50.112

101.12 ± 0.7806

LER

10

10.005

100.10 ± 0.7402

SD: Standard Deviation. *Denotes average of six determinations.

 

 

TABLE 3: RESULTS OF RECOVERY STUDIES

Analyte

% Recovery estimated (Mean ± SD*)

RSD*

ATN

99.10±0.7554

0.7622

LER

100.15±0.8743

0.8729

 

 

 

 

 

SD: Standard Deviation, RSD: Relative Standard Deviation.

*Denotes average of six determinations.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:

Sampling wavelengths were determined from scanning individual drug samples in 200-350 nm range. Sampling wavelengths were 275 nm and 322 nm for LER and ATN respectively in second order derivative mode. For ATN the concentration in sample solution was calculated by using formula Abs = A + B * C, where A = 0.0002027 and B = 0.0000191, C = concentration of ATN and correlation coefficient was 0.9996. For LER, the concentration in sample solution was calculated by using formula, Abs = A + B * C, where A = 0.00001952, B = 0.00005026, C = concentration of LER and correlation coefficient was 0.9984. Linearity of proposed method was found to be 5-40 µg/ml for LER and 5-30 µg/ml for ATN. Limits of detection were found to be 0.11 µg/ml and 0.31µg/ml of ATN and LER respectively. Results of capsule analysis were reported in table 1, result of precision studies and recovery study reported in table 2 and 3 respectively.

 

CONCLUSION:

The method used is simple and rapid and does not involve the use of complex instrument, low value of standard deviation showed that the method is precise and high percentage of recovery of as shown in table shows that the method is accurate.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:

Authors are thankful to Cipla Ltd. India, for providing the free gift samples of Atenolol and lercanidipine authors are also thankful to Principal, Bharati Vidyapeeth College of Pharmacy, Kolhapur for providing necessary facilities for this work.

 

Fig. 1: Overlain spectra of ATN and LER in second order derivative mode.

 

REFERENCES:

1.        Beckett AH, Stenlake JB. Practical Pharmaceutical Chemistry. Part 2, CBS Publishers and Distributors. 2002; 4th ed: p. 282-296.

2.        Indian Pharmacopoeia,Vol II Ghaziabad: Published By The Indian pharmacopeial commission, 2007; 749.

3.        The Merck Index, Merck and Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ. 1996; 23rd ed: p. 893, 8280.

4.        Clarks analysis of drugs and poisons, vol II: The pharmaceutical press,2004;563

5.        Kasture AV, Ramteke Madhuri .Simultaneous UV–spectrophotometric method for estimation of atenolol and amlodipine besylate in combined dosage form. IJPS 2006; 68 (3): 394-396.

6.        Ranta V, Toropainen E, Talvitie A, Auriolo S, Urtti A. Simultaneous determination of eight β-blockers by gradient high-performance liquid chromatography with combined ultraviolet and fluorescence detection in corneal permeability studies in vitro. J. Chromatography B 2002; 772: 81-87.

7.        Lamprecht G, Kraushofer T, Stoschitzky k, Linder W.Enantioselective analysis of (R)-and (s)-atenolol in urine samples by high –performance liquid chromatography column –switching setup. J. Chromatography B 2000; 740: 219-226.

8.        Patel YP, Patil S, Bhoir IC, Sundaresan M. Isocratic simultaneous reversed–phase high performance liquid chromatographic estimation of six drugs for combined hypertension therapy, J. Chromatography A 1998; 828: 283-286.

9.        Hutta M, Csilla Misl anova. Influence of various biological matrices (plasma, blood, microdialysate) on chromatographic performance in the determination of β-blockers using alkyl-diol silica precolumn for sample clean up. J. Chromatography B 2001; 765: 167-177.

10.     Modamio, Lastra CF, MarinoEL, Error structure for the analysis for atenolol, metoprolol and, and, and propranolol: a useful weighting method in parameter estimation. J. Pharm Biomed Anal 1998; 17: 507-513.

11.     Venkatesh G, Ramnathan S, Mansor SM, Nair NK, Development and validation of RP-HPLC-UV-method for simultaneous determination of bupravaqunone, atenolol, quinidine, and verapamil: A Tool for the standardisation of rat in situ intestinal permeability studies.  J. Pharm Biomed Anal 2007; 43: 1546-1551.

12.     Widling IR, Dobson CL, Davis SS, Chauhan S, The effect of ileal brake activators on the oral bioavailability of atenolol in man. International j. Pharm sci.2002; 248: 61-70.

13.     Hooper WD, Baker PV. Enantioselective analysis of sotalol in plasma by reversed –phase high performance liquid chromatography using diastereomeric derivatives. J. Chromatography B 1995; 672: 89-96.

14.     Alvarez-Lueje, Pujol S, Squella JA, Nunez-vergara LJ. A selective HPLC method for determination of lercanidipine in tablets. J. Pharm Biomed Anal 2003; 31: 1-9.

15.     Lanchote VL, Jabor Polisel VA, Coelho EB, Enantioselective pharmacokinetics of the lercanidipinine healthy volunteers. J. Chromatography B 2004; 813: 343-346.

16.     Lanchote VL, Jabor Polisel VA, Coelho EB,  Bonato PS, Enantioselective      determination of  lercanidipinine in human plasma for pharmacokinetic studies by normal-phase liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatography B 2003; 796: 429-437.

 

 



 

 

Received on 12.02.2009        Modified on 09.04.2009

Accepted on 07.05.2009        © AJRC All right reserved

Asian J. Research Chem. 2(4):Oct.-Dec. 2009 page 398-400